Is Vietnamese civilization a copy of Chinese civilization?
Version française
For a long time, based on Chinese annals, famous Vietnamese scholars such as Trần Trọng Kim in his work « The History of Vietnam » or Đào Duy Anh in « The Outline of the History of Vietnamese Civilization » have recognized that the Proto-Vietnamese originated in China or Tibet. This is why during the time of Chinese domination, the Chinese governors Si Kouang and Ren Yan had to teach them how to cultivate rice and how to live and dress (Book of Later Han). This is an understandable mistake because they need to rely on Chinese annals to find the source of reliable information instead of believing in Vietnamese legends recounting improbable things, the ancient territory of Vietnam being delimited by the Dongting Lake of the Chu Kingdom during the Warring States period, for example.
Even the Europeans during their stay in Southeast Asia in the 19th century had a rather short-sighted vision because they only discovered two major and brilliant civilizations: India and China. This is why they called Indochina to recall the notable influence of these two civilizations in this region including Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos. The recent discoveries of famous American archaeologists such as Wilhelm G. Solheim II, Carl Sauer, Chester Gorman (1965), Donn Bayard, Stephen Oppenheimer provide evidence confirming that the birth of agriculture took place very early in Southeast Asia. Between 9000 and 10000 years BC, its inhabitants were experienced farmers. They did not live only from hunting as European archaeologists used to describe. Around 8000 BC, there was a great cataclysm and a flood that forced these farmers to flee to other safe regions to protect themselves and earn a living. According to S. Oppenheimer, their traces have been found in the islands of Melanesia, Polynesia, and Micronesia. They spoke the language belonging to the Austronesian language family and were originally from Southeast Asia.
This is entirely consistent with the genetic data analyzed by the American team led by Professor J.Y. Chu of the University of Texas and published in July 1998 in the journal of the American Academy of Sciences under the title « Genetic Relations of Population in China »: the Chinese of today, especially those of South China (Hoa Nam) have ancestors in Southeast Asia. We can therefore say that the Bai Yue, especially the Luo Yue (the Proto-Vietnamese) were not Chinese and they knew agriculture very early. An axe dating back to 7000 BC was found by Chester Gorman in 1965 at the Spirit Cave in Thailand, while the axe attributed to China and brought back to Southeast Asia only dated back to 3000 BC. The Hemudu culture discovered in 1973 (5000 BC – 4500 BC) and considered to be the first very ancient domestic rice culture in China is also the Bai Yue culture because the Jiangnan province belonged during the Warring States period to the famous Wu-Yue king Goujian (496-465 BC). In fact, the Hoa Binh culture (12,000 BC-10,000 BC) that Madeleine Colani discovered in Vietnam and which was at the origin of Vietnamese civilization spread later and brought notable influence to the north. The people living in Hoa Binh at that time were called the Proto-Miao (they would later become the Proto-Vietnamese). They excelled in agriculture. That is why the Proto-Chinese used the pictogram Rice Field 田 below which appears the pictogram Vegetation 艹 to form the word Miao 苗 designating people who knew how to do agriculture. They left the Himalayan mountain range, Tiānshān (Thiên Sơn) several thousand years ago, followed the rivers in the East and Southeast direction and settled in Southeast Asia before traveling through the regions located in the south of China (or the south of the Yangtze River Delta). They were also called the people living in the hot country (or Viêm tộc) during the Chu Dynasty (nhà Châu) or the Bai Yue later. It can be said that the Hoà Bình culture was the flooded rice culture of the Vietnamese. It also favored the birth of the Hemudu culture (5500 TCN), the Đồng Sơn culture (500 years BC) etc.
As for the Proto-Chinese, they were also from Tiānshān (Thiên Sơn) but they were part of the nomadic tribes living from hunting and cattle breeding in the Xinjiang region. When it became desert (5000 BC), the Proto-Chinese were forced to follow along the Yellow River and advanced into northern China where the Proto-Miao were. They were called at that time the Yi. This pictogram Yi 夷 is the association of two pictograms Man 人 and Bow 弓 to designate a man knowing how to shoot with a bow. The Proto-Chinese were excellent warriors. This is why there is a confrontation that took place between them and the Proto-Miao led by Chiyou at Zhuolu in 2704 BC. They emerged victorious with the death of the latter.
For the Chinese, the first traces of their civilization date back to the Neolithic period in the Shang capital, Anyang (Henan) and Yangshao (Shaanxi) with several sites. It was the Swedish archaeologist Johann Andersson who discovered the first site in 1921. This culture, dating back to between about 5000 and 3000 years BC, flourished in the plains of the central highlands irrigated and shaped by the Yellow River for centuries. They cultivated millet, wheat and barley. According to the French historian René Grousset, rice is foreign to northern China (page 8) in his work entitled « History of China« . This fact is consistent with the spread and influence exerted by the Hoà Binh culture (12000TCN-10000 TCN) in the north. The Chinese living in southern China are Bai Yue, whom the Chinese have managed to sinicize because their blood contains the gene of the Proto-Miao or Bai Yue (like the Man Yue, the U Yue, the Shan Yue, the Wu Yue, etc.). This is why the Chinese are proud of the richness and diversity of their culture. Yin and Yang and the 5 elements, the Yi King, the tea, the curved roof of houses, the paper, the dragon, the chopsticks and the bronze drums, everything now belongs to them because it is located in the territory of the Bai Yue, i.e. in the south of the 5 Passes (Lĩnh Nam) of China except Vietnam. Yet at a certain time, the Bai Yue were still Nan Man or southern barbarians. This is one of the characteristic features of Chinese culture: it knows how to accept and absorb foreign cultures without ever being able to speak of vacillation or cultural modifications. This is what the famous 20th century Chinese philosopher Liang Shuming wrote in the introduction to his work entitled « The Master Ideas of Chinese Culture » (translated by Michel Masson).
This is in line with the following observation made by the French ethnologist and sinologist Brigitte Baptandier in her lecture text at an APRAS study day on regional ethnologies in Paris in 1993: Chinese culture has thus been formed over the centuries as a sort of mosaic of cultures. China needs a slow infusion of barbarian blood by readapting the beautiful formula of the historian F. Braudel for France with the barbarians. The Chinese introduce into their literature a Pangu creation myth collected from the ancestors of Yao. (Baptandier).
From the Qin-Han period onwards, there existed an imperial institution, the fangshi, who were local scholars considered magicians specializing in star rites and government recipes. Their role consisted of collecting, each in their own territory, ritual procedures, beliefs, local medicines, systems of representation, cosmologies, myths, legends as well as local products and submitting them to the political authority so that the latter could retain them or not and incorporate them in the form of regulations with the aim of increasing imperial power in an ethnologically very diverse nation and giving the emperor the means for his divine vocation.
Everything had to be collected and added to the service of the Son of Heaven in order to establish his legitimacy in territories recently conquered from the barbarians. This is why in the history of China there is an inconsistency that is difficult to understand because the Chinese used to take Mr. A’s outfit to dress Mr. B during the time of the Five Emperors and Three Augusts. All this is due in large part to the borrowing of traditions, customs and mythical characters or animals from the peoples they managed to sinicize.
Chinese demiurges such as Fuxi, Nuwa, Pangu, Shennong were borrowed from southern populations. This is the case of the great Chinese scholar Ruey Yih-Fu who sees in Fuxi and Nuwa a specific cultural trait of the Nan Man (Southern Barbarians) or that of Charles Le Blanc, the translator of Huainanzi (Hoài Nam Tử). For the latter, the cycle of Fuxi-Nuwa is a tradition of the kingdom of Chu. We tend to forget that from the Qin-Han era, the agricultural culture of the Bai Yue was integrated into Chinese culture so much so that the difference between these two cultures is no longer distinguished. China succeeded in largely sinicizing most of the Bai Yue except the Luo Yue.
They managed to escape from the yoke of the Northerners after a long domination lasting almost 1000 years. The Chinese took over everything that belonged to the Vietnamese but they failed to sinicize them because the Vietnamese continued to keep the characteristic way of life of the cultivation of flooded rice based essentially on the autonomy of the villages thus making the penetration of foreign aggressors ineffective with their traditions and customs. (The authority of the king yielding to the local customs of the village). This is why they only need two essential elements « Earth » and « Water » to refer to their country and their civilization. « Earth » and « Water » allow them to domesticate wild rice and help them to attach themselves deeply to their soil to protect the water (or country in Vietnamese), this is what their ancestors have managed to demonstrate many times the resistance to the peril of the Northerners for many centuries.